'저는 그들의 땅을 지키기 위하여 싸웠던 인디안들의 이야기를 기억합니다. 백인들이 그들의 신성한 숲에 도로를 만들기 위하여 나무들을 잘랐습니다. 매일밤 인디안들이 나가서 백인들이 만든 그 길을 해체하면 그 다음 날 백인들이 와서 도로를 다시 짓곤 했습니다. 한동안 그 것이 반복되었습니다. 그러던 어느날, 숲에서 가장 큰 나무가 백인들이 일할 동안 그들 머리 위로 떨어져 말과 마차들을 파괴하고 그들 중 몇몇을 죽였습니다. 그러자 백인들은 떠났고 결코 다시 오지 않았습니다….' (브루스 개그논)





For any updates on the struggle against the Jeju naval base, please go to savejejunow.org and facebook no naval base on Jeju. The facebook provides latest updates.

Wednesday, December 22, 2010

Text Fwd: China: Japanese Interceptor Missiles To Threaten Regional Stability

* Text sent from Rick Rozoff on Dec. 21, 2010

Global Security Newswire
Japanese Missile Defenses Could Prompt Arms Buildup, China Warns
December 21, 2010

A Chinese diplomat suggested Japan's plan to deploy additional missile defense equipment could threaten strategic stability in Asia and prompt an arms buildup by Beijing, the London Telegraph reported yesterday (see GSN, Dec. 13).

Japan last week unveiled plans to field additional Patriot Advanced Capability 3 missile interceptors and to expedite production of Aegis missile defense warships (see GSN, Dec. 17). Although Tokyo said the deployments were aimed at countering potential North Korean missile strikes, Beijing warned the plan would undermine Chinese defenses.

"Japan's new military investments are going to transform the military balance in the region," the Chinese diplomat said. "China will have no choice but to respond by enhancing its own capabilities."

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Jiang Yu characterized Japan's missile defense plans as "irresponsible."

Analysts expressed concern that an arms race could prompt India and later Pakistan to augment their own missile capabilities.

"China depends heavily on both conventional and nuclear-armed ballistic missiles to offset the technological weaknesses of its armed forces," said Ashley Tellis, an analyst with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, "so a more robust Japanese missile defense system is a real threat to its clout" (Praveen Swami, London Telegraph, Dec. 20).

No comments:

Post a Comment